From 45d7001bb05561d730841d02ffd50b50ed344f58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arthur Roberts Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 23:58:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Working! and cleanup collapsed got better results that passed checksum. NO idea why - I guess just being less "strict" on what the high / low period was --- components/dht22/dht22.c | 67 +++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) diff --git a/components/dht22/dht22.c b/components/dht22/dht22.c index 30a25f4..55bec8e 100644 --- a/components/dht22/dht22.c +++ b/components/dht22/dht22.c @@ -41,8 +41,10 @@ uint32_t wait_for_signal_to_change_from(int signal_level) { } */ - while (gpio_get_level(CONFIG_DHT22_DATA_GPIO) == signal_level) { + while (gpio_get_level(DATA_GPIO) == signal_level) { next_time = esp_timer_get_time(); + ets_delay_us(2); // just incase of lagging/debouncing/jitter/whatever + if ((next_time - start_time) >= 1000 * 10) { return DHT22_TIMEOUT_ERROR; } @@ -56,20 +58,20 @@ uint32_t wait_for_signal_to_change_from(int signal_level) { } dht22_error dht22_read() { - uint8_t data[5] = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}; uint32_t elapsed_time; + portDISABLE_INTERRUPTS(); /* * From datasheet: * - Host pulls low "beyond at least 1ms" * - Host pulls up 20us to 40us */ - gpio_set_direction(CONFIG_DHT22_DATA_GPIO, GPIO_MODE_OUTPUT); + gpio_set_direction(DATA_GPIO, GPIO_MODE_OUTPUT); - gpio_set_level(CONFIG_DHT22_DATA_GPIO, 0); + gpio_set_level(DATA_GPIO, 0); ets_delay_us(5000); - gpio_set_level(CONFIG_DHT22_DATA_GPIO, 1); + gpio_set_level(DATA_GPIO, 1); ets_delay_us(25); /* @@ -77,10 +79,10 @@ dht22_error dht22_read() { * - DHT pulls low 80us * - DHT pulls high 80us */ - gpio_set_direction(CONFIG_DHT22_DATA_GPIO, GPIO_MODE_INPUT); + gpio_set_direction(DATA_GPIO, GPIO_MODE_INPUT); // Maybe wait here until it goes high? - while (gpio_get_level(CONFIG_DHT22_DATA_GPIO) == 1) { + while (gpio_get_level(DATA_GPIO) == 1) { // wait for a while - should only be 20 uS } @@ -101,65 +103,26 @@ dht22_error dht22_read() { * - if 26-28us -> 0 bit * - if 70us -> 1 bit */ - //portENABLE_INTERRUPTS(); - uint8_t byte_i = 0; - uint8_t bit_i = 7; - for (int i = 0; i < 40; i++) { - - //for (int byte_i = 0; byte_i <= 4; byte_i++) { - // for (int bit_i = 7; bit_i >= 0; bit_i--) { - + uint8_t data[5] = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}; + for (uint8_t i = 0; i < 40; i++) { elapsed_time = wait_for_signal_to_change_from(0); - if (elapsed_time == DHT22_TIMEOUT_ERROR) { + if (elapsed_time == DHT22_TIMEOUT_ERROR || elapsed_time < 30 || elapsed_time > 70) { return DHT22_TIMEOUT_ERROR; } - if (elapsed_time < 35 || elapsed_time > 65) { - return elapsed_time; - } elapsed_time = wait_for_signal_to_change_from(1); - if (elapsed_time < 60 || elapsed_time > 80) { - data[byte_i] |= (1 << bit_i); - // TODO: check why this doesn't work - //data[i / 8] |= (1 << (7 - (i % 8)); - } - //ESP_LOGE(TAG, "bit: %i, byte: %i, elapsed_time: %lu", bit_i, byte_i, elapsed_time); - //} - ///* - if (bit_i == 0) { - bit_i = 7; - byte_i++; - } else { - bit_i--; + if (elapsed_time > 50) { + data[i / 8] |= (1 << (7 - (i % 8))); } } portENABLE_INTERRUPTS(); - ESP_LOGE(TAG, "data[0-4]: %x %x %x %x %x", data[0], data[1], data[2], data[3], data[4]); - - // TODO test that data[x] << 8 will be promoted to 16bits otherwise I'm - // shifting them to just zeros _dht22_relative_humidity = (data[0] << 8) | data[1]; _dht22_temperature = ((data[2] & 0x7f) << 8) | data[3]; - - float relative_humidity = data[0]; - relative_humidity *= 0x100; - relative_humidity += data[1]; - relative_humidity /= 10; - - float temp = data[2] & 0x7f; - temp *= 0x100; - temp += data[3]; - temp /= 10; - if (data[2] & 0x80) { - temp *= -1; - } - - ESP_LOGE(TAG, "rh: %f, temp: %f", relative_humidity, temp); if (data[2] & 0x80) { _dht22_temperature = -1 * _dht22_temperature; } - ESP_LOGE(TAG, "rh: %i, temp: %i", _dht22_relative_humidity / 10, _dht22_temperature / 10); + uint8_t checksum_val = (data[0] + data[1] + data[2] + data[3]) & 0xff; if (checksum_val != data[4]) { _dht22_relative_humidity = UINT16_MAX;