I get a timing error on every 4th bit
No idea why
This commit is contained in:
@@ -27,9 +27,28 @@ void dht22_handle_error(dht22_error e) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t wait_for_signal_to_change_from(int signal_level) {
|
||||
uint32_t tick_total = 0;
|
||||
uint64_t start_time = esp_timer_get_time();
|
||||
|
||||
while (gpio_get_level(CONFIG_DHT22_DATA_GPIO) == signal_level) {
|
||||
tick_total += 1;
|
||||
// TODO: Find a better way to determine the max timeout - perhaps find number of ticks
|
||||
// in 50ms or something
|
||||
// Or perhaps do actually run esp_timer_get_time in the loop or something
|
||||
if (tick_total == (UINT32_MAX - 1)) {
|
||||
return DHT22_TIMING_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
uint64_t next_time = esp_timer_get_time();
|
||||
uint32_t elapsed_time = next_time - start_time;
|
||||
return elapsed_time;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dht22_error dht22_read() {
|
||||
uint8_t data[5] = {0};
|
||||
uint32_t tick_total = 0;
|
||||
uint32_t elapsed_time;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* From datasheet:
|
||||
@@ -56,43 +75,47 @@ dht22_error dht22_read() {
|
||||
// wait for a while - should only be 20 uS
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
uint64_t start_time = esp_timer_get_time();
|
||||
|
||||
while (gpio_get_level(CONFIG_DHT22_DATA_GPIO) == 0) {
|
||||
tick_total += 1;
|
||||
if (tick_total == UINT32_MAX - 1) {
|
||||
return DHT22_TIMING_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
uint64_t next_time = esp_timer_get_time();
|
||||
uint32_t elapsed_time = next_time - start_time;
|
||||
if (elapsed_time < 75 || elapsed_time > 85) {
|
||||
return DHT22_TIMING_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tick_total = 0;
|
||||
start_time = esp_timer_get_time();
|
||||
while (gpio_get_level(CONFIG_DHT22_DATA_GPIO) == 0) {
|
||||
tick_total += 1;
|
||||
if (tick_total == UINT32_MAX - 1) {
|
||||
return DHT22_TIMING_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
next_time = esp_timer_get_time();
|
||||
elapsed_time = next_time - start_time;
|
||||
|
||||
portENABLE_INTERRUPTS();
|
||||
ESP_LOGW(TAG, "etime: %lu", elapsed_time);
|
||||
|
||||
elapsed_time = wait_for_signal_to_change_from(0);
|
||||
if (elapsed_time < 70 || elapsed_time > 90) {
|
||||
return DHT22_TIMING_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
elapsed_time = wait_for_signal_to_change_from(1);
|
||||
if (elapsed_time < 70 || elapsed_time > 90) {
|
||||
return DHT22_TIMING_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* From datasheet:
|
||||
* - DHT pulls low 50us -> into to next bit
|
||||
* - DHT pulls high:
|
||||
* - if 26-28us -> 0 bit
|
||||
* - if 70us -> 1 bit
|
||||
*/
|
||||
portENABLE_INTERRUPTS();
|
||||
for (int byte_i = 4; byte_i >= 0; byte_i--) {
|
||||
for (int bit_i = 0; bit_i <= 8; bit_i++) {
|
||||
|
||||
elapsed_time = wait_for_signal_to_change_from(0);
|
||||
if (elapsed_time < 35 || elapsed_time > 65) {
|
||||
return DHT22_TIMING_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
elapsed_time = wait_for_signal_to_change_from(1);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
if (elapsed_time < 60 || elapsed_time > 80) {
|
||||
data[byte_i] |= (1 << bit_i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ESP_LOGE(TAG, "elapsed_time: %lu", elapsed_time);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO test that data[x] << 8 will be promoted to 16bits otherwise I'm
|
||||
// shifting them to just zeros
|
||||
_dht22_relative_humidity = data[0] << 8 | data[1];
|
||||
_dht22_temperature = (data[2] & 0x7f) << 8 | data[3];
|
||||
_dht22_relative_humidity = (data[0] << 8) | data[1];
|
||||
_dht22_temperature = ((data[2] & 0x7f) << 8) | data[3];
|
||||
if (data[2] & 0x80) {
|
||||
_dht22_temperature = -1 * _dht22_temperature;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -70,12 +70,12 @@ void read_from_dht22() {
|
||||
portDISABLE_INTERRUPTS();
|
||||
int ret = dht22_read();
|
||||
portENABLE_INTERRUPTS();
|
||||
ESP_LOGE(TAG, "dht_ret: %i", ret);
|
||||
if (ret != DHT22_OK) {
|
||||
dht22_handle_error(ret);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
latest_datapoint.temp = dht22_temperature();
|
||||
latest_datapoint.rh = dht22_relative_humidity();
|
||||
ESP_LOGW(TAG, "%f & %f", latest_datapoint.temp / 10.0, latest_datapoint.rh / 10.0 );
|
||||
|
||||
if (has_ntp_time_obtained_once()) {
|
||||
// I _think_ I only want to be doing that rolling average and saving
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user